ben_hampel's profile

524 Messages

 • 

9K Points

Saturday, June 27th, 2026

Solved

Contributions constantly being declined

I've noticed a big increase in simple contributions being declined. I provide imgur jpgs to prove the point and they get declined three or four times with 'unable to verify' or 'badly formatted'. Is there a workflow that should be followed to avoid this from happening?

If an actor is interviewed in a documentary and below their name it simply says Actor that what I put under Self - Actor. I get in response 'badly formatted'. I provide a screenshot of the interview with the credit and I get again 'badly formatted'.

Someone has two names, a stage name and their regular name so I try to merge the two name pages. I get 'unable to verify'. I google the two names and the first thing that comes up are multiple articles stating in the headlines both names. A five second google search would verify the info. I do a screenshot of the google search and proved a imgur jpg and again I get 'unable to verify'.

Sometimes there will be two people with the same name. If the wrong person is added to something I add the correct person and request a deletion of the incorrect person. The added person gets added quickly. But the deletion takes awhile and eventually I get a 'unable to verify'. And the whole back and forth happens again. 

Plus how are you supposed to prove a negative? I recently filled out the cast of a four episode documentary series. Several people were listed on four episodes. However one person was only in two. I tried to remove her name and get a 'unable to verify'. How am I supposed to get a screenshot of someone not there? Especially hard if there are no end credits with the interviewees listed.

I get frustrated so I send an email to the Help Center arguing my case. Lately Sam has been very helpful. Some problems he solves immediately. Sometimes the contribution is resubmitted 'by IMDb' and show up on my contributor queue. Again they get declined. So I email the Help Center again and it eventually gets solved.

Sometimes a documentary will have people listed but only as Self or Self - interviewee. I watch the documentary and fill out the Role info. I notice that a lot of people who are identfied in the doc are missing so I add them. But what is frustrating is people who shouldn't be included are listed. If the subject of the documentary is shown accepting an Oscar you don't need to list everyone shown in the first five rows at the Oscars. If they don't really have a meaningful connection to the story don't add them. Once I worked on a doc and a president was being sworn in on Inauguration Day. Someone included every member of the First Family, the supreme court justice and every recognizable senator or congressperson on stage even though none of them speak or are identified and are only seen for a few seconds. There was no point to add them. 

Oldest First
Selected Oldest First

Employee

 • 

4.4K Messages

 • 

44.2K Points

1 month ago

Hello ben_hampel

Can you help us posting the 18-digits submission reference number for the contributions? to take a look for you!

You can find the submission number in your Contribution History page.

524 Messages

 • 

9K Points

Employee

 • 

8.5K Messages

 • 

89.2K Points

@ben_hampel​ - Hi, 

Thank you you for posting the references! Further reviewing, these have been re-submitted and/or approved. The changes will be live shortly.

524 Messages

 • 

9K Points

Thank you for help. Any advice on how to avoid all this in the future?

Employee

 • 

8.5K Messages

 • 

89.2K Points

@ben_hampel​ - You're welcome! These processing errors were reported to the respective team. 

If you have further supporting links or evidence you can add them. We know that you included links but if you have any additional evidence, you can go ahead and submit it too.

524 Messages

 • 

9K Points

@Maya​  260629-232231-510000

Employee

 • 

8.5K Messages

 • 

89.2K Points

@ben_hampel​ - Thank you! So I can see that this submission was marked as a 'duplicate' since there was already another submission where the new name page was already approved here: 260629-231100-627000. 

As per the credit, it has been changed to this new page you created for this other person. The changes will be live shortly.

(edited)

524 Messages

 • 

9K Points

You're correct. Thank you for your help.

Employee

 • 

8.5K Messages

 • 

89.2K Points

@ben_hampel​ - You're welcome!

2.1K Messages

 • 

58.5K Points

1 month ago

Hi @ben_hampel,

The contributor's life would be much easier when following some guidelines:

1️⃣ Last year the Self department was invented for listing the self appearances, so you don't need to input "Self - Actor" anymore. Just input "Actor" but into the Self, not the Cast section:

2️⃣ If two or more people with the same name are represented on the same page, then you can not delete the "wrong" ones, instead you need to split the page. This is how to: Splitting a Name

3️⃣ IMDb lists all self appearances, and there is no exception in the guidelines. This is very subjective to say "none of them speak or are identified and are only seen for a few seconds. There was no point to add them." The objective thing is the person appears on screen in a real-life activity, so any contributor can add the identified person to the Self department, but the "uncredited" attribute should be added if the person is not credited on screen. Moreover, if the person's name is announced (spoken), the "uncredited" should not be applied.

I hope it helps you further, and the rest of your questions will be answered by the employees.

Champion

 • 

16.8K Messages

 • 

355.5K Points

There are exceptions, like the archive footage guidelines which would typically exclude the people in an Oscars clip.

(edited)

2.1K Messages

 • 

58.5K Points

I see no mention of archive footage in this topic. Did one?

Reason is the soul of all law.

Champion

 • 

16.8K Messages

 • 

355.5K Points

@MAthePA​ 

Yes, a clip in a documentary from the Oscars or an inauguration would usually be considered archive footage.

2.1K Messages

 • 

58.5K Points

I also see no mention of a clip.

And "usually" is not equal to "always".

Not sure, the archive footage rules will help the topic starter in this case. If only he wants to know in general.

Reason is the soul of all law.

524 Messages

 • 

9K Points

@MAthePA​ Thank you for your advice. Yes I know to not type "Self" in the Self Department. I was giving an example of how it appears online when finished. 

https://i.imgur.com/AcjE71  Regarding two names... what you wrote is great advice when it's regarding one name page with two people's info. What I'm referring to is this.... I was looking at the page for the Mission to Mars documentary. It had listed Gentry Lee (II) who is a film producer. I added Gentry Lee (I) who is a NASA engineer and is interviewed in the film. I confirmed this by finding it on YouTube. I added (I) and tried to delete (II). Eventually it got resolved. 

Regarding who to include and who not to include, yes it tends to regard archive footage since I mostly work on documentaries. I don't believe you need to list every person you can identify. The president being sworn in for example.... if the clip being shown is Obama and he is the only person speaking I don't believe you need to list everyone sitting around him. I recall someone wrote on this contributor's board that they were a huge fan of someone and saw them credited in something on IMDb. So they watched the film only to discover the star was only seen in the background for a few moments and really had nothing to do with anything. They were pissed that they wasted their time. A big debate began about when to include someone and when it's not worth it. Eventually the star was deems not worthy of including. Credited or uncredited. 

317 Messages

 • 

7K Points

@ben_hampel​ 

 Hello. Fellow contributor here :-)

"I recall someone wrote on this contributor's board that they were a huge fan of someone and saw them credited in something on IMDb. So they watched the film only to discover the star was only seen in the background for a few moments and really had nothing to do with anything"

This is why you now put in "Audience member" or similar in the new "Role" field, instead of Self.

So people know that this person is not an Interviewee, because those would have "Interviewee" in the  Role field.

So your mentioned example will no longer be an issue.

I am not saying you should take the time to list everyone in the audience, that would take a lot of time, but if someone does add someone, you should also not delete them. 

You write

"If they don't really have a meaningful connection to the story don't add them."

I agree with @MAthePA

Different people will find different meaning with the data out of this, 

For an historian/journalist/documentary film maker etc. it would be meaningful which people attend a presidential event for example, some people refuse to attend, others want to attend, and that will show that they support the president.

This is therefore relevant to some, but not to others.

The fottage is proof tehy where there, so