Declined Birthdate Correction

Hi Maya, Thank you. I have got another one here, despite the detailed explanation & corroborating evidence. #251006-235922-260000

@jabrenner- You're welcome! Re-submitted as well and will be live shortly.

@Maya- Here's another one too #251006-112228-835000 And I attach another source of evidence for you to review where you can see May, 2000 information: https://ibb.co/nM7NYSh6

@jabrenner- Taking a look, this one has been re-submitted as well.

Thank you, I appreciate your contributons as well to make this database richer. I think these should be reported, editor in question seems to invalidate proper evidence.

Whoops, another set of rejects as of now: 1 - #251006-233456-509000 2 - #251006-114320-018000 (sometimes listed as Julia Emelin-Loeb as seen here https://www.bodalgo.com/en/voice-over-talents/julia-emelin and here https://imgur.com/a/hWwnszi, so this was submitted based on an educated guess with proof, but editor disregarded this).

@jabrenner- These have been re-submitted as well.

@Maya, here's another one. There was absolutely nothing to pose any verification problem with it. I doubt if the editor even checked the links properly. #251014-232456-227000

@jabrenner- This has been re-submitted and approved.

Thank you. And has it been reported too? Any action taken to ensure attentive examination? I know to err is human, but these errors shouldn't happen consecutively if the submission is already backed with reliable sources. If I observe the persistance of it, I may quit contributing this data type.

@jabrenner- You're welcome! Yes, they have been reported to the respective team.

Hi Maya, #251028-211850-367000 got rejected despite the obvious proof.

Hi jabrenner - This birthdate has now been approved. Cheers!