fan upscaled images, fan recreation?

what imdb thinks about fan recreated images?

there is a real cover which roughly looks like this. but this exact image has paper texture erased and replaced with a flat colour, the painting part is upscaled,

contrast is super high up, saturation is super high up. are such garish upscales go no go?

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1467376/mediaviewer/rm673964289/?ref_=ttmi_mi_3_1

Responses

Oldest First

Selected Oldest First

mrsflamingo

50 Messages

•

712 Points

2 months ago

My poster hasn't been approved. Why?

(edited)

4

agof

604 Messages

•

10.5K Points

@mrsflamingo they accept obvious slapped together fanart since forever and for 6 years i can't get anything done about that

https://www.imdb.com/list/ls4170495909/?ref_=tt_urls_2

do you see even one non slapped together fanart PRIMARY image?

Like

Reply

2 months ago

0

mrsflamingo

50 Messages

•

712 Points

@agof I don't specifically go looking for them. Just showing a link why they are not allowed. That's all.

Like

Reply

2 months ago

agof

604 Messages

•

10.5K Points

@mrsflamingo for the entirely fan made crap it's in the rules, and it was discussed here for years

this is a question of how much restoration is allowed. like is it okay to remove a hole? which upscaling is okay? always nearest neighbour or bicubic too? in which cases? pixel art or normal picture? taking a screenshot is already basically an upscaling since the screen is FHD and say DVD is 480. is it a matter of taste? or of the texture?

(edited)

Like

Reply

2 months ago

0

mrsflamingo

50 Messages

•

712 Points

@agof

"for the entirely fan made crap it's in the rules, and it was discussed here for years"

I don't know why I bothered.

(edited)

Like

Reply

2 months ago

0

agof

fan upscaled images, fan recreation?

mrsflamingo

agof

mrsflamingo

agof

mrsflamingo

Related Conversations

Helpful Widget