I originally submitted this as a contribution about a week ago and it was denied and when I asked why, I was told it was an opinion. Although half the contributions on the trivia anre opinions I thought I would go along with what you said so I reformatted it as you suggested and it was denied AGAIN.
When I reformatted it I couldn't have made it any clearer this is NOT an opinion. I went out of my way to stress that. When a person watches that deleted alternate ending, it's obvious Ridley Scott wanted the audience to be guided in that direction that Deckard is possibly a replicant too. You can't watch that scene and walk away thinking anything else.
So I need to know what the problem is? I think whoever keeps denying it is being arbitrary and petty in applying the rules.
17 December 2025#251217-142611-990000
Declined (1)
TRIVIA ADDITION
There is an alternate and deleted ending which shows a conversation between Rachel and Deckard in the car he is driving as they are making the way up north for their escape. And in that conversation Rachel says "I think today has been the best day of my life. You know what else I think? (as she then turns her head to look at him) You and I were made for each other." (and he looks at her with a subtle expression of the possible true meaning of what she has said, registering with him). It is a fact that if this ending scene had been left in the movie by Director Ridley Scott of what Rachel said, would have been an obvious indicator by the director that Deckard was a replicant, as she is basically saying that, knowing she is a created (made) replicant, that Deckard is a created (made) replicant, too. It is a fact that this deleted and alternate ending could have served no other purpose than to guide the audience into that possibility, because that scene in her line certainly wasn't to imply the poetic and romantic interpretation of "we were made for each other."Whether Deckard is or isn't a replicant is not a point of this scene. What is the point is the fact that Ridley Scott intended the audience to entertain that possibility.
Peter_pbn
Champion
•
16K Messages
•
346.7K Points
2 months ago
I think the result is long and awkward, and though the analysis may be corrrect it would be better to stick to a brief and factual style. I also think the item should be marked as a spoiler.
For example:
SPOILER: There is an alternate and deleted ending which shows a conversation between Rachael and Deckard in the car he is driving as they are making their way up north for their escape. Rachael says, "I think today has been the best day of my life. You know what else I think? You and I were made for each other." This line has been interpreted as implying that Deckard was a replicant like Rachael.
2