My Submission for chaning the plot outline of a movie has been denied for no apparent reason

The plot outline uses the word "producer" because the main character is a producer... But okay, I'll try rewording it.

Also this is the current outline: "Two television network reporters - one smart but insecure, the other less knowledgeable but more telegenic - compete for the friendship, respect and romantic interest of a hard-driven, neurotic female producer." It literally also uses the word producer in the same context. I'll resubmit my change again, hope it will get a more thorough read. 

@Fran​ 

The cited rejection reason is "Does not meet contribution guidelines", but the reason you give is not in the guidelines. If it is an actual rule, you could ask to have it added to the guidelines.

I can understand flagging contributions with certain words to have them double checked by staff, but banning a word like this seems bizarre.

@Peter_pbn​ I agree, I assumed the word "producer" was just flagged, and nobody read my submission to see the actual context so it was automatically denied because I guess the word "producer" implies that I named the producer of the actual film in the outline... 

Hi @MatthewMore,

Thank you for your further comment, and raising this issue again.

I can confirm that the above guidance as to why your contribution was declined is incorrect. The term "producer" is not prohibited in this context, and is not a breach of our standard guidelines per se. The reason given above is actually attributed to the prevention of the misuse of plot contributions, whereby a contributor may mistakenly talk about the making of the film, e.g. "produced by Joe Bloggs..." and as such not be contributing an effective plot outline. The  above internal misunderstanding comes from a misinterpretation of this particular ruling, and thus deemed a processing error. We therefore do not need to make any adjustments to the guidelines in this circumstance.

I can also see that you have re-submitted your original correction, which I have now approved. The correction should appear live across all IMDb platforms shortly.

I hope this helps!

Thank you for the help :)