136 Messages

 • 

2.4K Points

Wednesday, November 27th, 2024

In Progress

Reliable Sources Dismissed By Some Incompetent Editor

Hi, Lately, I have been shockingly observing weirdly declined birth date and birth name submissions of mine in spite of copied and shared as a screenshot via the solid, verifiable public records in addition to social media posts. I also come across this in some pending keywords. So, most of the time I have to submit again hoping them to be processed by a competent editor who knows what he is doing. If the same person processes them, you know the answer and my dismay. I have been a constant contributor in these data types, so lately this situation has been highly unfavorable. Unless the editor or editors in question has been warned, I am going to stop contributing them on a regular basis. 1 - Here, that person deleted the birthday and partially approved the submission despite the day is in the second link (submitted again, now approved): #241126-231440-332000 2 - Declined the birth name despite taken from a public record: #241126-202955-202000 3 - Declined the birth date & place despite the public record evidence: #241124-153119-927000 4 - Declined these keywords randomly: #241126-120042-181000 5 - Declined the birth date & place despite the public record evidence in addition to social media (submitted again, now approved): #241124-204609-080000 6 - Declined the birth date & place despite the public record evidence in addition to social media (submitted again, now approved): #241126-235621-899000 7 - Declined the birth name despite taken from a public record: #241119-005324-399000 8 - Didn't bother to check the second page for the birth name in addition to a public record: #241118-232014-832000 9 - Declined these keywords randomly: #241118-123239-722000 10 -Declined these keywords randomly: #241118-114737-454000 11 - Randomly declined parents guide submission: #241115-123245-714804 12 - Declined the birth name despite taken from a public record: #241102-202114-269000 13 - Declined the birth name despite taken from a public record: #241022-235644-399000 14 - Deleted the birthday and partially approved the submission despite the day is from a public record (submitted again, now approved): #241126-234245-634000

Oldest First
Selected Oldest First

136 Messages

 • 

2.4K Points

10 months ago

Some recently re-submitted ones have been approved now, probably by another editor. However, the overall problem still needs to be addressed. I am waiting for a reply from the staff regarding this situtiaton. On a similar note, #241127-160036-272000 still declined despite the same source of evidence.

(edited)

Employee

 • 

5.6K Messages

 • 

58.9K Points

10 months ago

Hi

136 Messages

 • 

2.4K Points

Hi @Bethanny - Even if that is case in some of them, some were obviously not checked properly despite being supported by social media accounts, other links etc. and it has sadly become a common thing, ignoring all the other info. My resentment is mostly towards this, and I believe they should be warned. As for keywords, many of sexual nature are declined in general as if there is an actual rule against them stated in the guideline.

(edited)