Trying to change to 'incorrectly regarded as a goof'

I don't understand. Why is the source of the contributions relevant? I didn't ask for "any details about our sources or contributions". The point is that it's not valid information because it's not supported by the content of the film. What further information are you looking for on my part? Would it help to quote the dialogue from that part of the movie? Also, I could use some guidance on this general problem. I've asked about it before but didn't really get an answer: For someone to submit a 'goof' or 'connection', they don't have to prove that it IS true. But when I try to delete it because there is nothing to support it, I have to prove that it's NOT true first. Why is that?

I can see that your recent correction was approved, is there anything missing to correct in the entry? if so please let us know or submit the change for us to verify, you can post the 18-digits submission number here for us to help you.

Thank you for getting back to me but you didn't answer any of my questions. I'd appreciate it if you could. In order to get my correction approved, not only did I have to point out that it was possible for for a kamikaze to hit a plane without warning such that the crew was not at battle stations, I had to find a source online that showed that it ACTUALLY happened at some point during WWII that a kamikaze hit a plane without warning such that the crew was not at battle stations. That seems like an unnecessary level of research. And, why is it that the original submission was approved as a 'goof' though the person didn't have to in any way prove that ships' crews were ALWAYS at battle stations in every single case that a kamikaze hit a ship in WWII? It seems to me that the higher burden of proof should be on the person submitting it as a 'goof'. I look forward to your response with the answers to my inquiries. It will be very helpful for me when submitting in the future. Thank you.