Live Poll: IMDb - The Ignition of Online Movie Fandom

Take the one you do the most. ;D

Since there are a few hundret million visits on the page and just a few hundret poll votes a day, I decided to put it on position 23. But the people who vote visit the polls, so I've put it on 10th position. Do you think that is ok, od do you have a special idea where it should be?

That's fine. :) I just think since they're already located at the bottom right corner on the IMDb menu, there's no need to have them at the bottom of your list.

FYI, I found a similar poll from ten years ago: https://www.imdb.com/poll/DH9_wHY5lEo/

That's interesting. babuandbabu should update his poll. There are 3 images that vanished.

Yeah, babu hasn't been active on the board for many years.

@Jessica babuandbabu IMDb member since September 2012 https://www.imdb.com/user/ur36285655/ https://www.imdb.com/user/ur36285655/lists/ 4 https://www.imdb.com/user/ur36285655/ratings/ 2,199 1,732 total polls taken .

What do you suggest?

Perhaps you could moderate the statement by adding "internet" or "online": it’s where online movie fandom found its spark

Good idea. I've changed it. Would you think I should also do that to the title?

Thank you, Ruby. :D I guess it would be best released at October 17 or short afterwards.

P.S.: To not force a false impression, Ruby. I wrote the text in aproximately that lenght and then let it optimize a little by chatgpt. I took a part of what I wrote but changed a few words I didn't have on my radar. Especially when it comes to some common formulations, I'm ailing a little and sometimes I must take the dictionary to find the best words. But all-in-all, my language skills improved a little faster with using chatgpt, by comparing my words with its wording. So I see better ways to express something - and that gave me a little boost to get better. This posting was written completely without chatgpt. I think it's a good tool, if one uses it proper and not with blind trust. I also saw by some researches that chatgpt does fail when it has too less facts to work with or often tries to give a pleasing answere when there is none. Then it sounds good by reading first, but when thinking closer there might be gaps which have to be filled by answeres to further enhancements in the user's question. There might even be fitting questions about real events, but with wrong results. I asked about a Sir-Mix-A-Lot commercial in the movie 'Falling Down' (1992). Chatgpt gave me an answere about a poster in the scene with the phone box, but there wasn't a poster. I asked again with enhanced parameters. I told it, that it might be a big brown plastic b.u.t.t in the background of the phone box. chatgpt made a wider research and found out that it was a campain of his record company for his new record and even told me the correct measures of the plastic thing. With dates of the campain and so on. But first gpt told me about a poster. It's a tool to use with brain. Don't trust it blind, but anyway it's way more efficient than Google.

P.P.s: I think it's ok to use it for preventing texts that have to be corrected 20 times. I think it's a blessing for us. The ideas still have to be thought, the options still have to be figured out. The images still have to be found and compared (which is better). I think it doesn't make creativity itself more easy, but it makes the work on creativity more easy. I made an experiment a while ago to figure out, if chatgpt could write me a script for a movie. I've set the data of the story and was surprised how gpt would mix it up. It felt good at first, but thinking closer, the story wasn't really good. gpt has not the emotional abilities to understand the characters' issues from the view of humans. There it fails. I'm sure it can't really write good scripts for screen. The human factor, the feeling misses. Anyway it was no serious attempt for writing a script. I was just curios about, because of the writer strikes in Hollywood. But I think they can lean back. These will not be good scripts on a drama-base.

Thank you, Jessica. Thank you, Buddies. :D

That's our times. Everything has to be stuffed with commercials. If I would buy that all, join all, submit all, I'd be paying back for a few hundret thousands of years. I also voted for polls. Madame Breu voted for cast informations.