Poll Suggestion: Face-Off: Do You Already Use Artificial Intelligence?

The Two Sides of Your Traits Direct & Blunt Less Likeable: Can feel brusque, impatient, or dismissive. More Likeable: People know where they stand with you — you’re honest, no-nonsense, and cut through pretense. Skeptical / Critical Less Likeable: May come across as distrustful, nitpicky, or hard to please. More Likeable: Shows sharp critical thinking — you don’t get fooled easily, and people can trust your analysis. Intense About Topics Less Likeable: Others may find it overwhelming or “too much.” More Likeable: Passionate and knowledgeable — you make conversations stimulating and memorable. Detached / Cerebral Less Likeable: Can seem emotionally distant, harder to “read” or connect with. More Likeable: Objective, calm under pressure, able to think clearly even when others get caught in emotions. Impatient With Fluff Less Likeable: Might look dismissive or uninterested in small talk. More Likeable: Efficient, focused, and respectful of time — people know you won’t waste theirs.

Did you put the suggestions in to an IA to figure that out? ;D The mere main problem with AIs is that they always want to give a pleasing answere. And there lies a problem within. They often have not enough intelligence to understand your points, where a human opposite would think a little other, because of knowing how people may fail in expressing themself. AI checks your grammar and typos and corrects them for itself. A fine feature, but it can come to false interpretations, especially because AIs do wrong interpretations of what you said and do seldom ask if they understood right. I once asked about the promotion of Sir-Mix-A-Lot's "Baby Got Back" in the movie 'Falling Down' by the phone box shooting. chatgpt interpreted that as poster, so it has put out something with poster. It did complement wrongly, because the promotion was a big, 7x5 meter high, black *ss, made out of plastic standing in the background. Conclusion: chatgpt often doesn't check all fatcs and when not knowing, it complements supposeable content, which might be wrong. But with correcting it, and re-asking, the AI found a correct answere with background information about the promotion campain of Sir-Mix-A-Lot. The most urgent need is to re-check the plausibility of the answere of the AI, especially when people correct the aswere wrongly and the AI takes it. AI is not a tool, which is to be used brainless! It's like with computers: "A computer doesn't do what you want it to do, but what you tell it to do." If the question is wrong, there will be just a little chance to get the correct answere. The more you make it precise with all intentions and the needed sources you tell the AI, the more it becomes useful. It is fun to ask silly question, the AI often can reveal that and may joke a little around with you, if you want that. I asked the AI, if something on the body could also healed with magma. The AI told me it supposes I'd make jokes which was true. So I further joked around with the message, "But magma is all I have here, at the moment." So the AI adjusted itself to joke a little around with me. That was funny! :D I also had some profound improvements creating polls with it. But I don't use it to create whole polls. I wouldn't want that. It's always how you use it. You can use it in a way that makes sense, or just joke around. But you will always have to be careful asking correctly, if you want a proper, serious purpose. And you will always have to check the result. As the AI gave me (just) a few obviously partly incorrect answeres, I'm about to re-check it myself, if I use the result of its research, or if I ask the AI better. So the use of AIs also corrects me myself in finding better and more qualified questions. That's the most useful point for me. Because I have to rethink the core- issue of what I want to examine.

I've let the text I wrote re-check by AI to make it more understandable, a quarter shorter and keeping the sense of it 100%. I also gave it the order to correct grammar and typos: The main problem with AIs is that they often try to give a pleasing answer. This leads to misunderstandings, as they lack the intelligence to interpret unclear points the way a human might. A person can sense when someone struggles to express themselves, while AI simply checks grammar and typos, risking false interpretations. Since it rarely asks for clarification, mistakes easily arise. For example, I once asked about the promotion of Sir Mix-A-Lot’s Baby Got Back in the movie Falling Down. ChatGPT assumed it was about a poster, though in fact the promotion was a huge 7x5 meter plastic backside in the background. Only after correcting and re-asking did the AI deliver the right information. The urgent need is to re-check the plausibility of AI answers, especially when corrections are wrong and the AI accepts them. Like computers: "A computer doesn’t do what you want, but what you tell it to do." If a question is vague, the answer will rarely be right. The more precise your input, the more useful the result. It can be fun to ask silly questions too, since AI sometimes recognizes jokes and plays along. I once asked if magma could heal the body. The AI guessed I was joking, so I continued: “But magma is all I have right now.” It adapted and joked back, which was amusing. I also achieved improvements when creating polls with AI, though I never let it create the whole thing. It’s always about how you use it. If you want serious results, you must ask carefully and double-check the output. Wrong or incomplete answers happen, but that forces me to refine my own questions. That self-correction is the most useful part for me, because it helps me rethink what I truly want to examine.

Which text do you think is better?

They are roughly the same. The A.I. corrected some spelling, etc. errors. Oh, I specifically asked the LLM to "list my most likeable and unlikeable qualities, based on my past interactions with it." 1 - 3 are accurate. 4 is accurate when I am sober. 5 is inaccurate. I actually do engage in a lot of fluff and small talk with humans, but not with the bot; I only use it for information.

What is LLM?

LLM = Large Language Model, like chatGPT :)

Thak you. Interesting. But this idea also stands not only for movie busines. AI is also used in medicine techniques, techniques in general, military and simply some use it for re-interpreting Shakespeare.

@Breumaster Breumaster https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/users/5f495619c17a0660597f700d Thursday, August 21st, 2025 Poll Suggestion: Which Film Best Reflects Humanity’s Relationship With Artificial Intelligence? List: https://www.imdb.com/list/ls4106565052/ .

I know it's close. But not the same.

Thank you for your interest. The problem is the limitation in Face-Offs. I'd put your suggestion on the list, if I wouldn't lose the fifth otion, then. It's formulated a little harsh/naughty, because so many people who would vote with "no" are completely refusing it, considering movies like 'Terminator', 'M3gan', or 'Subservience'. Some fear it that much, such an option should be a pick on the list. These are not less people.

Yes Breu, I mentioned on another poll that my greatest concerns at present regarding AI are (1) Deep Fakes and (2) other forms of Info Manipulation, such as in the Financial Sector. People think of HAL-900/Skynet/VIKI scenarios. But AI is a tool and a technology, like any other, albeit a very powerful ones. As with all preceding technologies, the concern is abuse by humans, not Skynet stuff; the state of the art of General AI is nowhere near there.

-----

Can anyone please tell me why exactly my last three posts here are censored? Are you serious?

Breu, I can see your post on my notifications. Testing k.n.i.f.e.

Okay, testing s.t.a.a.b Edit: No idea??

Why shouldn't it be a good poll suggestion?

-----

Never mind. I thought it was a 2 option YES-NO poll. I see there are 5 options that span various levels of usage. It's good. I'm sleep deprived, lol. I'm deleting the previous posts.

One of the mere main ideas of the poll is to ask people how concious they are about AI in our lives. I know people who strictly pay with money, never with card, because they doN't want to give evidents to have been there or there at that timestamp, while they carry cell phones with them. "They" can control you. It's always "them" by those people. But they are also potential controlable by carrying their cell-phone with them. You may know, but how many users really don't know using AI while e.g. driving or telling the phone bot of a company, or simply using search engines?

No problem I wish you a healthy and deep sleep. Sleep tight. :D

I'm settinh up a potential poll of films and shows that were good despite having a lacklustre if not outright annoying lead or co-lead. Problem is, almost all are female 🤔🤔

Did you already post the thread of your idea? I would rather discuss it there. I must admit that I really have to think about that idea. It's not soo easy finding that. But it sound like a good and singular idea. Can't remember there was something like that before.

Do you already have candidates?

The original 'The Texas Chain Saw Massacre' (1974), maybe.

I havent made a thread yet. I'll stop spamming this thread. :)

Everything alright. I would appreciate if you'd put a link here, when you made your thread. For the people who are interested in our conversation and would like to join your idea.