bjornhakansson's profile

7 Messages

 • 

154 Points

Saturday, December 20th, 2025

No Status

2

Top 250 ratings formula

I think it should be clear that the current algorithm or formula that determines the weighted IMDb rating for the Top 250 movies is flawed. I have watched most of the movies from the official Top 250 lists from the past 25 years and there are movies that get ranked high due to high popularity with a narrow viewer group, be it gamers (Demon Slayer movies) or national groups (Turkish or Indian) that have many voters. Such films lack the wider general appeal that I think should be a criteria for appearance in the IMDb Top 250. I think the formula should take into account votes in such a way that one or a few countries alone cannot determine a ranking. Maybe a ranking should be calculated using a balanced weighting based on votes from all continents. I think IMDb should look into this to safeguard the legitimacy of the Top 250.

Oldest First
Selected Oldest First

1.1K Messages

 • 

12.5K Points

1 month ago

Those Asian cartoon based movies actually have a massive international audience, across the world and various age groups. (Personally I have no interest in such things, but.... )

You do have a point re: the Indian and especially Turkish films. 

7 Messages

 • 

154 Points

Yes, agree. I just recently watched the first Turkish Chaos Class movie that has a 9.2 rating on IMDb; totally rubbish and embarrassing that is has a higher rating than many Hollywood classics.

7 Messages

 • 

154 Points

1 month ago

As an example we can take the Turkish movie The Chaos Class failed the class that currently ranks #148 on the IMDb Top 250 with a weighted score of 8.5 based on 29,202 votes. Of the total votes more than 20,000 votes are from Turkish voters that gave the film an average of 9.0, while 1,520 US voters gave it an 6.6 in average, 616 UK voters a 6.9 and 255 Dutch voters a 6.7 in average. The Turkish voters outnumber the combined US and UK voters with almost ten to one, and then I don't take into account Turkish voters who live in the US or UK that may have influenced their average. These kind of regional/cultural upvoting is disastrous for the legitimacy of the Top 250 chart. Maybe the country of origin should never be allowed to count for more than 25% of the voting weight? The Chaos Class movie ranks higher than e.g. The Deer Hunter on place 207 that has an almost equal score across several countries. I hope IMDb will look into this.

(edited)

3.3K Messages

 • 

92.3K Points

@bjornhakansson​ Regarding this particular film, I hope a staffer will look into this and respond.

The original film currently has a rating of 9.2 (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0252487/reference/) and has only been in the Top 250 a few days way back in 2005 (http://top250.info/movie/?0252487), while the second film "only" has a current rating of 8.5 (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0252488/reference/) and has been in the Top 250 since April of this year (http://top250.info/movie/?0252488). It seems that they should either both be in the Top 250 or both not be in the Top 250. The fact that one of them is in it and the other one isn't, suggests that IMDb isn't consistent regarding the threshold to get in the Top 250.

7 Messages

 • 

154 Points

@Marco​ Yes, you have a point there which I also had thought about. Especially since the first film with a higher rating also has more votes, in total 46k of which 31k from Turkish voters and 15k from non-Turkish voters. The second film has a lower rating, but also fewer voters, in total 29k of which 20k from Turkey and only 9k from non-Turkish voters, of which many probably due to its place in the Top 250 or from the Turkish diaspora in other countries. There is no logic why the second one is on the chart when the first one is not. With so few votes outside Turkey I think none of them belongs to an international Top 250 of best films ever.

7 Messages

 • 

154 Points

I hope @Col_Needham or @Sally will be able to look into this.