Data Issues & Policy Discussions

Data Issues & Policy Discussions

This category is managed by our IMDb Content team. IMDb Content is the team that collects and manages the content that makes IMDb authoritative & accurate. We depend upon our users to supply the majority of our content, and will use this space to both answer questions and collect ideas for how to make IMDb more authoritative, accurate, and easy to add to.

21.2K

  • •••
(21298)
#260526-020108-258000 - Hollywood Steps Out

Item rejected because "Does not meet contribution guidelines." I've searched and nowhere in the Guidelines can I find that all signs in cartoons must use correct grammar. Please tell me which guideline this does not meet.

Problem

 • 

Solved

51

1

0

#260522-053441-613000 - Blazing Saddles

I take exception to the 3 items declined in the subject reference. One (Taggart's gun catching on a chair) changed a "Miscellaneous" goof (which some submitters use way too often) on the basis of Goof Guideline C for Miscellaneous: "This category is hardly ever used - if you can't shoehorn your goof

Problem

 • 

Solved

52

1

0

#260517-164432-712000 - Swingers

Seven items I submitted to correct violations of the IMDb Guidelines were declined due to "Does not meet contribution guidelines." However, Section D.8 of the IMDb Goof Guidelines state: DO use only 3rd person perspective ('he', 'she', 'it', 'they') when writing your submission. Do not use 1st perso

Problem

 • 

Solved

51

1

0

#260517-112614-728000 - Strangers on a Train

A "Factual Mistake" Goof item expressed the submitter's opinion (i.e., not a fact), and I submitted a correction with explanation of why it should be Incorrectly regarded as goof. The reason given for declining was "Does not meet contribution guidelines." However, per IMDb Guidelines, personal opini

Problem

 • 

Solved

58

1

0

AI generated image spotted on Rocket Monkeys episodes

Hello there. I found out that something isn't right regarding the images presented of some Rocket Monkeys episodes. I noticed that a few episodes of Season 2 has an AI generated image of a soccer player, something that is never present in the actual episodes itself. This is clearly FALSE advertising

Problem

 • 

Solved

65

1

0

Uncredited title

I'm credited as the director of the following video: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt36953030/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0_tt_1_nm_0_in_0_q_festival%2520inquieto%25202022, which is true, but my name doesn't appear on-screen. I've tried to correct it as an uncredited title, but IMDb rejected it. Here's the eviden

Problem

 • 

Solved

62

1

0

Incorrect "Russian" genre tag automatically added to my title "Hilberton"

Hello community and IMDb staff, I need assistance with a persistent issue regarding my sci-fi series "Hilberton" (ID: tt42177069). On the title page, the word "Russian" is incorrectly displayed in the main Genre/Header section. I have checked the 'Edit Page' menu, and this word is not listed under G

Problem

 • 

Solved

52

1

0

Accepted Solution

#260516-044747-496000 - The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit

Two separate Goof items were submitted regarding the same issue; the first described why the submitter thought it was a Goof, while the second, rather than correcting the first, submitted information that contradicted the first. I marked the second item (fewer votes than the first item) to be delete

Problem

 • 

Solved

56

1

0

Changes from TV Series to TV Special or Movie keep getting rejected

Two examples: Dining With the Kapoors: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt35665487 All you have to do is go to the Netflix official site (https://www.netflix.com/title/81702885) and see that this is NOT a series, it is a special. The site itself states that this is a "Documentary Film" and not a series. Y

Problem

 • 

Solved

95

2

0

Approved reviews not posted.

On 15 May, I posted two reviews (#260515-182144-319021 and #260515-180841-665621). Both are noted as Approved, and have been so since at least 18 May. Yet they are still not posted. The help-site claims that there should be a one business day turnaround, so they should have been posted on 18 May. An

Problem

 • 

Solved

51

1

0

Popular Posts

View More

Loading...
Loading...